payday loans

Take Note Of The Middle East

I don’t blog on foreign policy but I  don’t discount the importance of world events nor their impact on economies. Events in Syria and throughout the Middle East are taking a decidedly ugly turn which could make the crash of 2008 look like a walk in the park. Walter Russell Mead has a moderately lengthy post in which he discusses policy and economic consequences of a regional conflict.

This administration appears to start from the assumption that the only really bad thing that can happen to the United States in the Middle East is that we can get sucked into its wars if we aren’t careful. It’s an understandable error given what happened to George W. Bush, but it is an error nonetheless. The worst thing that can happen to the United States in the Middle East is that the Persian Gulf melts down and the oil flow stops, wrecking the global economy (and, despite our healthy domestic supplies, our own), bringing down the world financial system, causing mass unrest in country after country, and creating a messy situation in which a variety of ugly and expensive US interventions are absolutely required. The administration has been zealously guarding against the Little Satan of unnecessary involvement in a regional war while ignoring or even facilitating the rise of the Great Satan of full-blown regional strategic disaster. Its poor handling of an escalating series of regional problems is increasing the chance that those problems will cascade into a major global crisis.

No one is anxious for another adventure in this region of the world, and the President’s reluctance to venture in is understandable. One would hope that somehow a lid can be put on this simmering brew. In the meantime it’s probably not a bad idea to put the Middle  East on your radar and adjust your portfolio as things move along.

Share
No Comments »

Why Is New Home Construction Lagging?

This is what the National Association of Home Builders said yesterday:

June 17, 2013 - Builder confidence in the market for newly-built single-family homes hit a significant milestone in June, surging eight points to a reading of 52 on the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) released today. Any reading over 50 indicates that more builders view sales conditions as good than poor.

“This is the first time the HMI has been above 50 since April 2006, and surpassing this important benchmark reflects the fact that builders are seeing better market conditions as demand for new homes increases,” said NAHB Chairman Rick Judson, a home builder and developer from Charlotte, N.C. “With the low inventory of existing homes, an increasing number of buyers are gravitating toward new homes.”

The eight-point jump in the index was the biggest one-month gain since August and September of 2002, when the HMI recorded a similar increase of eight points.

“Builders are experiencing some relief in the headwinds that are holding back a more robust recovery,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Today’s report is consistent with our forecast for a 29 percent increase in total housing starts this year, which would mark the first time since 2007 that starts have topped the 1 million mark.”

This is what they reported today:

“The outlook for housing continues to brighten as builders respond to increased demand for new homes and rental apartments,” said NationalAssociation of Home Builders (NAHB) Chairman Rick Judson, a home builder from Charlotte, N.C. “While challenges with regard to the cost and availability of building materials, lots and labor are still keeping the pace of improvement in check, both builders and consumers are more confident about their prospects in the current marketplace.”

“Unusually wet weather across much of the country likely dampened the pace of single-family production in May,” noted NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “Nevertheless, the strength in permit issuance for single-family units — and stockpiling of permits for future use — provides further evidence that housing continues on a slow and steady path to recovery.”

While single-family housing starts held at a solid but virtually unchanged pace of 599,000 units in May, multifamily production bounced back from an over-correction in the previous month with a 21.6 percent gain to 315,000 units. From a regional perspective, combined starts activity was mixed in the month, posting gains of 17.8 percent in the South and 5.7percentin the West and declines of 9.0percentin the Northeast and 13.7 percent in the Midwest.

Issuance of new building permits declined 3.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 974,000 units in May. This reduction was due entirely to a 10.0 percent decline to 352,000 units on the multifamily side following a spike in that sector’s permits in April. Meanwhile, single-family permits edged up 1.3 percent to 622,000 units in May — their best pace in five years.  Regionally, permits rose 4.0 percent in the Northeast but declined 6.1 percent in the Midwest, 3.3 percent in the South and 3.5 percent in the West in May.

All that optimism doesn’t seem to be translating into much production. What gives?

Well the NAHB says that, yes sentiment is bullish but wet weather, increasing prices for materials, lots and labor are keeping things in check. There’s also a theory floating around that the builders aren’t in a hurry to bring a lot of new inventory to market while prices are rising so fast. I suppose there’s some truth in all of this but it still seems as if there is a disconnect here.

Take a look at this graph.

Graph of Privately Owned Housing Starts: 1-Unit Structures

 

 

We’ve only managed to struggle back to a level of home construction that is the low point of previous recessions. Moreover, the bounce off the bottom is to say the least distinctly less robust than at any time since 1960. To add insult to injury, consider that this chart is not adjusted for population growth. They’re are a lot more potential buyers out and about now than there were 20 or 30 years ago. I know it’s been a perilously long and weak recovery but I’m less than totally convinced that something isn’t terribly amiss with the new home construction business, I just can’t figure out what it might be.

It’s not that I’ve been a bear with respect to the home builders. Given razor thin inventories and an apparent surge in demand, if one is to believe the stories of bidding wars, I thought we would see them ramping up big time by now. Nothing in the data indicates any big time ramping. I can’t refute the contention that material prices might be up but I don’t buy the labor argument. I know too many guys who have experience and would be back in the business in a heartbeat if there were jobs out there. Moreover, the recession knocked the pins from under labor rates for even skilled tradesmen like plumbers and electricians so I don’t see the cost issue there.

I can’t come up with a good reason for the paltry production of home builders and that makes me nervous. Do they see something in the housing market I’m missing? Is the ostensible boom and increase in prices a function of froth and speculation that they perceive and I along with a lot of others are missing? Are they fearful of a fragile economy tipping back into recession or at least going into stall mode? Do they have a new model predicated on maintaining very lean inventories and higher margins than in the past?  Lots of questions, no good answers. Any input is certainly welcome.

Share
No Comments »

Footnoting The CBO

Sentences that should never have been written:

Good news for immigration reformers: The Congressional Budget Office has scored the Senate immigration bill and concluded it will cut deficits by $200 billion in the first 10 years and $700 billion in the second 10 years.

I am for immigration reform as I have previously stated and suspect that it will be a net positive for the country and the economy as past waves of immigration have proved their worth. Having said that may I suggest that not just the author of the above quotation but all writers have the decency to at least footnote any projections from the CBO and like organizations as highly unlikely to have any predictive value at all.

Share
No Comments »

Munis And Jefferson County Alabama

Remember Jefferson County, Alabama, the county that embarked on a sewer renovation program which ultimately led to the largest government bankruptcy in US history. It’s a long story which is summarized here, but the bottom line is it involved a fair degree of larceny on the part of lobbyists and government officials as well as the use of financial engineering far beyond the ability of the local folks to understand. So, they’re emerging from bankruptcy and they’ve learned a good lesson, right. Well apparently not.

The county’s plan to emerge from bankruptcy protection hinges in part on the sale of $1.9 billion of new debt this fall to refinance debt tied to its troubled sewer system. But some observers call terms of the new debt onerous.

The proposal for the refinancing, which has been approved by a majority of county commissioners, includes a set of bonds that schedule larger debt payments in the later years of the financing. About $474 million are a type of debt called capital-appreciation bonds. Such bonds have been derided by California’s treasurer as “terrible” for their back-loaded payments, and Michigan has banned their sale by municipalities.

All told, Jefferson County taxpayers would stand to repay nearly $6.9 billion over the four-decade term of the financing, more than three times the amount the county initially plans to borrow. That is perhaps billions more than they would pay under a plan whose payments would be more evenly distributed, said a potential investor.

Almost always and everywhere capital appreciation bonds have been toxic. The few successes, and I use that word advisedly, have been in municipalities with rapidly growing populations which could expect to see growing tax receipts and for which the need for capital improvements was immediate and imperative. Jefferson County meets none of those criteria. It is not growing and the sewers are already in.

So why go down this road? Frankly, I can’t figure out a good economic reason. Apparently they’re unable or believe that they would be unable to amortize the new debt in a traditional manner. But if that’s the case why not make that argument to the court and argue for a reduction of the new debt required by the settlement.

One is left to assume they negotiated the best deal possible and the court was persuaded  the county could indeed shoulder this new debt load. Indeed it might have been possible to do so but at significantly more cost to the residents of Jefferson County in which case the local officials are signing off on the capital appreciation bonds as a matter of political expediency, something with which they appear to be woefully experienced.

The good citizens of Jefferson County and their legislators are entitled to choose their own path and if that leads to further wrack and ruin then that is their problem. For the rest of us, well we should probably get a lot more cautious about munis. That plain vanilla general obligation bond you have your eye on might be part of a liability structure which can bring the whole house of cards down. Or as we may learn from the Detroit mess, health and pension obligations might not be modifiable in a bankruptcy proceeding if state constitutions hold them inviolable, thus leaving the entire burden of restructuring on the shoulders of bondholders. Try getting any recovery in that case.

 

Share
No Comments »

Why Central Planning Always Fails

 

Jeffrey Dorfman, an economics professor at the University of Georgia, has an entertaining article at Real Clear Markets which reprises the two basic arguments against government central planning. His thoughts aren’t new but in an age in which belief in the ability to solve every problem usually goes unchallenged it’s worth noting his arguments.

For government to make a market work by exerting control it needs to know everything: the cost structure of every seller and the willingness to pay of every buyer. Without all this information, the government cannot obtain its desired result. Certainly government can try to adjust as it goes and might eventually get it right, but, unfortunately, since business costs change and people’s preferences are fickle, the government has to hit a moving target.

When you factor in not just the amount of information required but also the intelligence, the problem gets even worse. The politicians and the bureaucrats in all the government agencies think they are very smart. After all, it takes at least intellectual confidence if not arrogance to believe you know enough to legislate and regulate the economy to where you want it to go.

Unfortunately for the government, an important lesson to learn is that the people are smarter than the government.

Do read the entire article, particularly for his examples of citizens outsmarting government.

Share
No Comments »

Few Are Concerned About PRISM

Saturday I wrote that the PRISM uproar had the lifespan of a weekend. Hardly one of my bolder predictions. Judging by this report from the Pew Research Center, the American public could care less. Not only are few people terribly interested but opinions on government spying seem to be driven more by party affiliation than principle.

6-10-13 #7

6-10-13 #4

There are other interesting results at Pew’s site.

Small wonder that President Obama and most members of Congress don’t seem obliged to go much beyond the defense that everything was legal, reviewed by the courts and that we need to do this to protect ourselves. Edward Snowden, the whistleblower, has ruined his life for naught.

Share
No Comments »

Apple Thinks Small

So this is what passes for game changing after Jobs? The Business Insider’s summary of Apple’s new iOS 7 operating system:

  • Control Center: This menu appears when you swipe up from the bottom of your screen. It lets you control basic settings like WiFi, Bluetooth, and screen brightness. It even has a flashlight option.

  • Multitasking: Now all apps can make use of full multitasking. iOS 7 is smart enough to manage the apps without draining your device’s battery. This means you can pick up where you left off in any app. There’s also a handy swiping gesture for closing out apps.

  • Safari: The Web browser has a much cleaner look. It also has 3D tabbed browsing that makes switching between windows easier.

  • AirDrop: Lets you swap files with other iPhones and iPads via WiFi.

  • Camera: The camera app has a new look that makes it easier to switch between each different mode. There are also several Instagram-like filters built in.

  • Photos: The new photos app can automatically build new albums for you based on when and where you snapped the photo. You can quickly share your photos via iCloud, Email, Facebook, or Twitter.

  • Siri: Siri has a new design too. It can control basic functions on your phone like brightness. Apple also integrated Bing search results.

  • Car integration: iOS 7 can sync with certain cars, giving you full control of your iPhone while on the road.

  • App Store: Apps now update automatically. You can also search for apps based on what’s popular in your location.

  • Music and iTunes Radio: The Music app has a new design and includes access to iTunes Radio, a streaming radio service similar to Pandora. iTunes Radio is free, but supported by ads.

  • Security: A new security feature lets you wipe all the data from your phone remotely if it’s lost or stolen. It also prevents the phone from being reactivated again unless the thief has your Apple password.

  • WiFi Calls: You can make phone calls over a WiFi connection. This will result in clearer calls that are less likely to drop.

  • Devices: iOS 7 will work on iPhone 4 or later, iPad 2 or later, and some newer models of the iPod Touch.

It’s probably unfair to be overly critical of Apple’s current management. Sure this stuff is small ball but there’s no guarantee that Steve Jobs would have come up with anything significantly more earth moving. The iPhone was brilliant innovation not invention and there is just so far that you can proceed with an innovative idea.

Share
No Comments »